Articles Posted in Investor Fraud

48-wallstreet
In a speech delivered at Georgetown University, FINRA CEO Robert Cook expressed the Regulatory Authority’s intent on helping brokerages identify and supervise brokers with a history of disciplinary action.

From now on, FINRA is going to look very closely at how firms hire and supervise high-risk brokers, Cook explained.

Firms should have heightened supervision in place to prevent potential violations by brokers with a history of misconduct. According to Cook, it is firms themselves who have asked FINRA for more guidance on the issue.

47-stock-market-pricing
The SEC recently asked a federal judge to freeze $5.4 million of Avalon FA Ltd.’s funds, on account of its practice of “layering.” A Seychelles investment firm run out of Ukraine, Avalon allegedly engaged in illegal market manipulation.

Layering, in the SEC’s words is, “a scheme in which orders are placed but later canceled after tricking others into buying or selling stocks at artificial prices, resulting in illicit profits.” Layering is also used in a different way in money laundering.

According to the SEC, Avalon FA knowingly spammed markets with trade orders they had no intention of fulfilling. When the SEC’s lawsuit was first announced, Avalon funds were frozen through a temporary restraining order (TRO).

35-barclays
Barclays Capital has reached a $97 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to resolve allegations that its Wealth and Investment Management Americas (WIMA) unit overcharged clients by $50 million between 2010 and 2015.

The SEC’s investigation determined that Barclays Capital, which sold its WIMA unit in 2015, incurred violations of multiple sections of the Advisers Act, the Exchange Act, and the Securities Act.

The $97 million penalty to be paid by Barclays includes fines in the amount of $30 million fine and $63.8 million in disgorgement and interest. Another $3.5 million will serve to refund specific clients with underperforming accounts.

29-reits-office-buildings
Purshe Kaplan Sterling Investments (PKS) of Albany, New York, recently agreed to pay $3.4 million to a Native American tribe to resolve allegations that one of its brokers, Gopi Krishna Vungarala, took millions of dollars in undisclosed commissions on the tribe’s investments.

Vungarala was not only a financial advisor to the tribe; he was also employed as its Treasury Investment Manager, which allowed him to participate in investment decisions. Vungarala allegedly used his position for his own personal gain, although he was purportedly aware that employees of the tribe were banned from engaging in any business activities that might imply a conflict of interest.

According to a statement by FINRA,“Vungarala was able to misrepresent to the tribe that neither PKS nor he would receive commissions on its purchases, and he was therefore able to induce the tribe to invest more than $190 million in non-traded REITs and BDCs. In fact, Vungarala personally received at least $9 million in commissions from the tribe’s investments.”

31-investor
During the “SEC Speaks” Conference 2017, Acting U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Michael Piwowar amply discussed the plight of the “forgotten investor.” Citing the work of sociologist William Graham Sumner, who spoke of The Forgotten Man, “the victim of the reformer, social speculator, and philanthropist,” Piwowar questioned disclosure requirements, high corporate penalties and accreditation rules, which, he believes, have had a negative impact on lower-income  investors.

“Imagine,” Piwowar said in his speech, “that we lived in a utopian world in which perfect disclosure of all material information about every company simply existed as a natural feature of the market landscape. Securities markets would be perfectly efficient… Investors would have just what they need… to make perfectly informed investment decisions.”

The Acting SEC Chair focused on the problems of disclosure, stating that the “forgotten investor” seldom has all the relevant information in hand in order to make those decisions. He compared lower-income investors to Graham Sumner’s “Forgotten Man,” who “works, he votes… he always pays… All the burdens fall on him, or on her.”

28-suntrust
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is considering whether it will bring enforcement actions against Atlanta’s $205 billion-asset SunTrust Banks. SunTrust Investment Services, the bank’s broker-dealer arm, allegedly purchased pricey mutual funds on behalf of customers when more affordable alternatives were readily available.

The SEC has made a “preliminary determination to recommend that the SEC bring an enforcement action against [SunTrust].” If these were to materialize, the financial institution could face hefty penalties and extensive losses in connection with its investment business.

Additionally, its fast-track privileges for the issuing of securities might be revoked for three years.

26-businessman
It may come as no surprise that doing business in China holds a high risk of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) violations. However, the record-setting numbers of FCPA enforcement actions seen in 2016 placed Mexico in a close second.

With increases in multi-jurisdictional anti-corruption enforcement, the FCPA Pilot Program and a number of new Mexican statutes signed into law, those doing business in Latin America may want to take note.

After six years of relatively consistent (and somewhat low) FCPA enforcement numbers, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) have made 2016 a precedent setting year. A combined total of 53 actions – more than double those of the last four years – brought over $2 billion in U.S. corporate fines and billions more in fines by foreign regulators. While 22 of the of 53 FCPA enforcement actions prosecuted in 2016 involved FCPA violations in China, Mexico followed close behind with nearly 17% of the enforcement actions last year.

gavel
Lincoln Financial Securities Corp. recently settled with FINRA concerning supervisory deficiencies over a now-deceased rep (Kenneth Wayne McLeod) who purportedly ran a Ponzi scheme targeting retired government employees (Department of Enforcement v. Lincoln Financial Services Corp. – Case No. 2010025074101). A copy of the FINRA AWC can be accessed here: (FINRA AWC). FINRAs case is a follow-up to an SEC action which charged Kenneth Wayne McLeod’s estate and entities run by Kenneth Wayne McLeod with operating a Ponzi scheme promising investors with tax-free returns of 8% to 10% per year (Securities and Exchange Commission v. Estate of Kenneth Wayne McLeod, F&S Asset Management Group, Inc. and Federal Employee Benefits Group, Inc. – Case No. 10-22078, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida). A copy of the SEC Complaint can be accessed here: (SEC Complaint). The supervisory deficiencies noted by FINRA were:

  • Lincoln Financial failed to place McLeod on heightened supervision given that Lincoln Financial hired McLeod while a state securities regulator had an open investigation.
  • Lincoln Financial’s registration department failed to inform McLeod’s supervisor of the pending state investigation and the advertising review department failed to inform the supervisor of concerns over McLeod’s advertising.

fact-check
The North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA) recently released its Enforcement Report for 2012. A copy can be found here.

NASAA is an association primarily comprised of state securities regulators. Through the association, its members engage in multi-state enforcement actions and other collaborative activities. NASAA’s Enforcement Section tracks trends in securities fraud and oversees the activities of various Project Groups, including: Internet fraud investigations, oil/gas ventures, Reg D investigations, securities investigation database and enforcement zones.

The Enforcement Report contains a multitude of interesting statistics. According to NASAA:

finra-rule
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) views its mandate as investor protection and as such, they have given notice that a new suitability rule, Rule 2111, will go into effect on July 9, 2012.

As long as there have been investors and brokers, there have been people who take advantage and people who are taken advantage of. This rule codifies a standard that FINRA thinks is best for the investing public by imposing more stringent regulations on securities that a broker recommends to buy/sell, including those within a client’s existing portfolio. Rule 2111 has significant implications for broker-dealers who maintain retail brokerage accounts. The rule by its own terms, carves out institutional accounts: So if you are a broker-dealer that sells to hedge funds, this is not a game changer. But if you are selling to Main Street as opposed to Wall Street, then this is a very significant rule.

The new rule contains three guiding principles. Each recommendation must have:

Contact Information